Standard youtube license: The standard license is the permission you get from a competent authority before using or owning something. For internet usage, it has to do with taking permission to use, copy, or distribute content that you find online.
YouTube is an online video sharing platform with its own rules and regulations that’s in line with the license policy they use.
When a YouTube user uploads a video to the platform, they have different license options that they can choose from. One is the standard YouTube license, and the other is the creative commons license.
If you’re a YouTube content creator, it is understandable that you have a problem choosing between creative commons license and a standard YouTube license. In this article, you will learn the difference between both and why a standard YouTube license is better because of the creative control that it gives you.
Table of Contents
Explaining the Standard YouTube license and Creative Commons License
This type of license allows you to have creative control over the video content you post on YouTube. You can also restrict video usage. So, you have the content’s copyright so that other people cannot use the video without first taking explicit permission from you.
With this license, you are granting the rights to broadcast to YouTube. What this means is that your content is only on the platform to watch only. This means that reproduction or distribution of this content in one form or the other is prohibited and requires your consent even if such a thing needs to happen.
For the creative commons license, people from YouTube have the exclusive rights to use your content in any way that they want to. With this type of license, you’re simply saying: you can use the content anyhow you want to; just make sure to give me the credit that I deserve for this work.
The Difference Between Both Types of Licenses
From the simple explanations of these types of licenses, it is obvious that these licenses are different from themselves. The question is, to what extent are they different?
Basically, the difference is that the Standard license doesn’t allow anyone to use your content and reproduce them as their work. As the original uploader of the video content, this will enable you to have the right to disagree with the video being reused because it might change the whole meaning of the content altogether.
However, for the second type of license: creative commons license, another author can use any part of the original video content. This means that other people generally have the permission to edit, change, or recompile the initial content except for a few listed parts. This license includes the original content’s copyright and clearly mentions that the new work was gotten or sourced from another one which is the original source. Also, the original creator of the content won’t be held responsible or accountable for damages that the contents derived from theirs may cause.
This is the significant difference between the creative commons license and the Standard YouTube license.
Answers to common questions
Now that you understand the difference between the two types of licenses, you also realize that you have more creative control with the standard YouTube license than the creative commons license. If this is the case, then you are likely considering settling for the standard license for your video content. Before you do so, here are some common questions that people ask that you should also know.
Is sharing videos with a standard YouTube license on social media an illegal act?
You can rest assured that it isn’t in any way illegal or criminal to share a YouTube video on any social media platform, even if it has the Standard YouTube license. Firstly, you should know that there wouldn’t be a share button on other social media platforms if it were illegal to share. So the fact that there is a share button means it is a legal action. Also, when you click on share or copy and paste the URL, you are simply pointing others to the content that bears the original author’s name. So, it is not an illegal action.
Is it possible for TV shows and media companies to feature my content without requesting permission from me?
Generally, media companies are very profitable organizations. So, before they use any content, they have to seek the legal permission of the owner or author of that content before they can use it. The need for permission becomes even more important if the video author uses the standard YouTube license. Then the media house is mandated to request and get permission to use the video from the original owner that uploaded it to the platform first.
Can videos that are marked “YouTube standard license” be used for nonprofit purposes?
If a video is marked or has YouTube’s standard license, then there is a legal rule guiding its usage already. The video creator can claim their work because they have been given the right to do that. However, if you are going to be using the video for a nonprofit purpose, you need to find a way to convince the video owner that you won’t be making any gains by using their content. This means that you still need to seek their permission before you start to use the video.
These are some of the few things you need to note when YouTube’s standard license is involved. You should note that if you are looking to monetize your video content, you should use the standard YouTube license instead of creative commons. This also applies to all content that you want to have complete creative control over.
If you have content that somehow has another content match, it would be impossible for you to use the creative commons license for it. This is because you cannot give permissions for others to use the content (you lack the right to do that).
Emily Harrinson is one of the most influential editors and an essay writer online for a big company in London providing a cheap assignment writing service,professional writing services, and college paper writing services,She has been working in this company since 2006. Her hobby is reading books. But besides that, Emily is fond of sports and music. She is a very positive person.